In summary, I would concede that students who perform badly should be fail, as it makes students more lazy, damage school's reputation and unfair to the diligent students.

According to the authoritative report, the number of college student is growth, while the quality is not as good as before. In the meantime, whether students perform badly should fail the course have spoken much debate? Some assert that school should not be so desperate, just turning a blind eye to their behavior, while others convinces that student should take their responsibility for their performance. Personally, I’m in favor of second one.

据权威报告，大学生的数量持续上涨，而质量却不如以前好。同时，表现不好的学生是否应该不通过考试已经有了很多的辩论？有的人认为学校不应该如此绝望，对学生的行为只是视而不见，而另一些人认为学生应该为他们的行为负责。就我个人而言，我支持第二个观点。

Convince arguments can be made that if school let all students pass the course, it will increase their laziness. To start with, students will not worry about being registered by disciplinary inspector when they get up late. Therefore some of them will play computer games very late until midnight. Some students even don’t attend the class and finish assignments. They hold a view on mind: even they get a low score on final exam, they still can pass it. Besides, some students do some part-time jobs or join in student union but they can’t be the excuses for escaping learning.  Finally, if teachers get all students through the exam, it must be unfair to struggling students and damage school's reputation.

使人信服的理由有，如果学校让学生通过课程考试，会增加他们惰性。首先，学生们不用担心起床晚了被纪律检查员记名。因此，有一些人会玩电脑游戏玩到很晚，一直到午夜。甚至有些学生不上课，也不写作业。他们坚定的认为：即使他们期末考试的时候分数很低，他们仍然会及格。此外，一些学生做一些兼职工作或参加学生会，但都不能作为逃避学习的借口。最后，如果教师让所有的学生通过了考试，对那些努力学习的学生肯定是不公平的，也会损害学校的声誉。

In summary, I would concede that students who perform badly should be fail, as it makes students more lazy, damage school's reputation and unfair to the diligent students.

总之，我认为那些表现不好的学生应该不及格，因为这样会使学生变得更懒，损害学校的声誉而且对勤奋学习的学生不公平。